Cuesta Meeting & New Park

Comments

Jim

Sorry but in my opinion I think you are playing with peoples properties on the basis of what you are being told and believing every word. They may be right but these are the very people who have been part of the problem that has put so many owners in the position they are now in. If you are going to advise people not to sign or register their ‘interest’ you should first seek independent advise away from Zurgena. Appreciate that is not your role or a cost you should incur but you cannot accept all that you are being told as truth. Many of us thought we were being told the truth, even have the paper work to prove it, but like all other properties in the district we are now told we are illegal.

Please explain why my lawyer:

Please explain why my lawyer: when notifications from the TH stated that an action was being taken on a number of properties, which the TH failed to inform us of correctly, but the other people that did receive the notice were given only 10 days to register their interest: our lawyers informed us that under Spanish law you are entitled to register interest, even if the action is not directly at you, but if you do not then you might have no right at a later date. That you might even be deemed to know after a certain time if an action has been made. Not registering an interest might take away certain rights. We registered such interest and it had nothing to do with denuncia to builders or TH’s, that is something we might do later if we are told that we will remain illegal or classified as ‘return to dust’ (can’t think of the Spanish term at present).

So as far as I am concerned we have a conflict of information and I would much rather take my lawyers advise (not one in Zurgena) than one that is being paid for by the council and certainly not the advice of Candido who has informed you in the past that people are wasting their money going to lawyers to register interest because as far as he is concerned all properties are legal. That has yet to be proven!

What I fail to understand is that you are suggesting that now the Courts of Spain are working on behalf of the Junta to get property owners to start actions against their builders and TH’s (a sneaky way of getting people to effectively denounce either the council or their builder). If this is the case, we are in bigger trouble than I first thought. Courts do not create cases, cases are put to Courts.

The Mayor of Albox has stated that it could take 3 or 4 years to get many properties ‘legalised’, yet we are told in Zurgena that they hoped to resolve these issues by the next election which is in two years time. Jim, we don’t even have a PGOU to start off with like other districts, we are already six months behind on the inventory that was to be completed in Dec 08. How does Candido plan to get the issues sorted? How does he plan to convince the Junta that we have not exceeded the 30/40 rule which is crucial to any urbanisation development or PGOU? Tell it how it is, IMHO the first approvals will be for limited areas around the centre of Zurgena, then over several years he might be able (if still in power) add other urbanisations. Will not even go into the costs of the infrastructures that will be demanded in many areas in order to make them legal, who do you think is going to pay for that?

So by not registering your interest you may as far as we have been told, not be able to claim remedy for infrastructure incomplete or compensation should the worst happen. WE ARE TALKING SPAIN!!!!!

Thank you Brian for your input.
As always I advised people at the meeting that the facts I was giving them were those given to me by solicitors and the Mayor. In the 2 years I have been working with them I started out as a complete sceptic on the idea that all the legal machinations were politically motivated but having seen the actions taken and made enquiries as to who and when such actions were initiated I am satisfied from my personal stand point that what I have been told by these people has proved to be correct.
I do however couch any statement I make to people that it is my personal viewpoint based on my contacts and they must make their own mind up about what course of action to take. It is for each individual to take what course of action they are most comfortable with and/or can afford.
It appears to me that your solicitor has given you differing facts to those which I have been given firstly I am told that it is incorrect to state that you have to lodge an interest in any case at this early stage of the process and it is, in fact, better to await a court's decision because you can then identify which body it is that you wish to take action against, because at this stage no one knows and you would have to pay for representation at each stage until guilt or otherwise is decided. So we both have very conflicting advice there. If I get a chance at Court I will again ask the solicitor for confirmation of what he has already told me.
Regarding the political motives behind these case I can confirm to you that my questions regarding how and when these cases have been initiated leads very directly to the Junta who, by the way, appoint both the Fiscal in Almeria and the Judges in Huercal Overa. All cases brought before the Huercal courts were instigated by the Autonomic Police who are, you guessed it, appointed by and directed by the Junta! There are many examples of the Autonomic Police initiating action against some houses on one side of a road but not against others on the other side of the road,. Different municipal area!
I have also seen many instances where solicitors have told outright lies to clients to ensure they get business. For example writing to clients who are back in the UK using fraudulent letters (purporting to be from Courts) to suggest that they need to engage them to act for them otherwise their houses may be demolished. It transpired that they were doctoring letters from to make it look like it was from court when in fact it wasn't!
Regarding the situation with the legality of properties the first of the cases (which had already been heard in the lower court and found in the Town Hall's favour) reached the appeal court in Granada last month (the 100 Prodelor houses) and the court ruled in favour of the Town Hall, with costs against the Junta, as they always said they would. The latest case at the Civil Court in Almeria was the Sunlit houses in La Alfoquia and again this was won by the Town Hall and the judge directed that the Junta should not appeal it as the decision was reached on the same basis as the Prodelor houses.
Whilst I realise that people are given different bits of advice from different sources what I always said I would do was to try and convey to people in Zurgena any and all information which I was made privvy to. I realise that people will be suspicious of information direct from the Mayor and that is their prerogative but at least they have that. I have not found them to have lied to me about anything YET!

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in